this is a blog for people who are ugly. not only who are ugly but who are so ugly in a way that at the end of the day, you cannot help but assume they are pretty. if there is nothing ugly about you, go away! you should be at least ugly in ONE DEPARTMENT, whether it is personality, skin colour, face, behavior, clothes or even the smell that you give people when you pass by. ALL UGLY PEOPLE, LET US START A PARTY AND SHOW THE WORLD THAT UGLINESS IS THE NEW PARIS HILTON
The blog is written by potentially- intelligent Journalism students, who are defeated by Garfield’s curse of laziness.” I was one of the members of the blog but when I was unable to get inside the blog, I started to do my coursework on my own blog. I am shocked to come to the blog, for which I was one of four creators, to find only two posts! My own personal blog is far better than this. Maybe the rest of the group members were unable to to log in too, and ended up with their own blogs or maybe they started another blog.
Journ Assasinshad the potential to be an amazing collection of beautifully written pieces if there were many posts. As one of the original members of the blog put it, “The writing will focus on international issues worthy of analysis, critical opinion or political dissection.” The blog had the potential to produce good analysis of the modern world. I am judging this by the quality of one of the posts in the blog called “A Question of Priorities.” The post is another proof that the blog has potential intelligent owners who leave you hungry with little information. There was not even the name of the writer!
What the blog does is to give you a drop of water on your heavily thirsty lips, only to spill the rest of the water on ground while you watch with your thirsty mouth. They need to invest in their work.
As the exams are coming, I am coming up with ways to study well. One of the best ways is to study on top of a tree. It means that you will get higher marks.
I was to write my Linguistics test today on Japanese. Every normal Linguistics student knows that Japanese is the worst thing to ever invade Rhodes Lingusitics Department. There is no way you will get higher marks without some supernatural powers.
I found my powers from studying high, literally. Studying on top of a tree! Not only does it make you get higher marks(which is yet to be proved when the papers come back) but it also:
Garners crazy attention. The tree was on the way to the St Mary's dining hall and it made me a celebrity. Everyone was looking at me thinking I was mad(well that is not a good reputation). If the Linguisticas marks come back high, I swear I will study for the exams on top of the tree.
Every single day, a number of Rhodes students commit suicide. The sad fact about this suicide is that it is silent. The reason why students forget that they are killing themselves, and others who are inhaling the fumes, is because this suicide is part of life. It has become an everyday norm. If one finds his friend trying to commit suicide, one will go to get help from a professional. The opposite will be for one who smokes.
The reason why I am saying that smoking is suicidal is because it is written on the pack, “Smoking kills.” This overtly dreadful message is ignored as one takes out a cigarette and smokes. I am also classifying smoking as suicide because we all know that every cigarette taken has the ability to reduce one’s lifespan.
Most of the students at Rhodes are generally in their teens and early twenties. It is disturbing when one thinks of how their lungs will be looking when they are in their thirties. Their health is also of great concern. The sad fact is that even though it is written on the pack that smoking can cause cancer, it seems to be ignored. Every day, students inhale chemicals that are dangerous to their health.
My main argument is that we are living in an ignorant world. People damage their lives when they know the consequences. Smoking is among the many ignored messages in our society. It is among drinking, unsafe sex, drugs, self-mutilation, to name but a few.
The story is about how disappointed minister Lindiwe Sisulu is that the news about the new airbus military transport aircraft has already been spilled to the media, while she was still privately planning to brief President Jacob Zuma. The news is a delicate subject in South Africa because the money that is supposedly going to be used for the deal might be used to solve other problems in South Africa. An estimated R 47-billion is going to be spent for the new military aircrafts.
This news proves one of South Africa’s flaws in spending its money and serving its people. The money that is being talked about is not R 47-million but R 47-billion! In the midst of poverty, housing problems, poor education and the financial crisis, South Africa is using its money for new military aircraft. Is this more important than the education, housing and poverty alleviation of the country? It would at least make some sense if we were in a war with Iraq but we are not in a war. Just as one of the citizens in the accompanying video said, the last war we fought was World War II and it is not necessary for this military funding.
The action of putting all the money in the army in the middle of a financial crisis is shocking. I am also surprised that Lindiwe Sisulu was expecting such big news to be private in a democratic country, which has to promote transparency of information.
Still in love: An elderly couple from Cape Town is seen here on Manday 05 October 2009, at the Greenacres Trunslux station in Port Elizabeth. They are waiting for the 9pm Trunslux to Cape Town from a small holiday in the Eastern Cape. They are ready to go back home finally, after a long wait for the bus. They sit at the station, the old woman slumbering, while the old man tells me of how they have been married for 42 years, how his son was shot in the aparthied times, when he travelled the whole of South Africa as a driver and why they are still in love. Picture: Ntendeni Luvhengo
RUMOUR HAS IT THERE IS A GHOST AT NEW HOUSE. WHEN THE ORGANISATION OF WOMEN WHO LACK BEAUTY(OWLB) HEARD IT, WE LAUGHED BECAUSE WE THOUGHT IT WAS A HOAX. BUT A FRIEND HAS SEEN THE GHOST WEARING BLACK. OTHER PEOPLE HAVE SEE IT NEXT TO A TREE(RUMOUR) WEARING BLACK TOO AND IT DID NOT HAVE A FACE. GOD BLESS OLIVE SCHREINER. I HOPE WE HAVE NO SURPRISES TOO. ALL THE UGLY WOMEN DO NOT FORGET OUR MEETING ON THURSDAYS.
WE ARE HERE TO INFORM YOU OF THE DEATH OF 'PRETTY UGLY' FROM OUR SOCIETY OWLB(THE ORGANISATION OF WOMEN WHO LACK BEAUTY). AS YOU KNOW, PU(PRETTY UGLY) WAS THE MOST BEAUTIFUL LADY IN THE SOCIETY AND SHE EMBARASSED US WHEN WE TRAVELLED BECUASE SHE WAS TOO PRETTY FOR THE SOCIETY. WE ARE HAPPY THAT SHE IS DEAD THOUGH BUT ALSO SAD. WE ARE SAD THAT SHE HAD NO CHANCE TO KNOW THE TRUTH ON TIME. SHE DISAPPEARED SOMEWHERE BETWEEN JOZI AND PE BECAUSE SHE JUMPED OFF THE PLANE THINKING THAT SHE WAS GONNA FIND DB COOPER'S MONEY SOMEWHERE DOWN THERE. SHE SHOULD HAVE WATCHED 'PRISON BREAK' WITH US. DB COOPER'S MONEY IS BURRIED IN UTAH UNDER THE FLOOR OF A GARAGE OF AN OLD SEXUALLY LONELY WOMAN. R.I.P
Before I begin with the topic, let me make it clear that I have put the word “foreigner” in inverted commas because a light bulb moment once stoke my mind that made me start to question the use of this word and its connotation. I have also put the phrase “from overseas” in inverted commas because I started scrutinising this phrase too. These two phrases are the focus of this comment.
I originally wrote this article for mirror newspaper in Venda and it did not make it to the paper. The senior editor of the newspapers had a brief look at it and corrected me to use the phrase “who is a foreigner?” instead of “who is the foreigner?”. I accepted the change but I realised that I had to explain why I used the word “the’ instead of the word “a”.
The reason is that I wanted to create a scenario with the word “the” taking into account that the definite article intensifies the meaning of this opinion more than “a”. I wanted to create a scenario where two people would be sitting on a bench, one form Africa and the other from overseas. While these two are sitting next to each other, a father would come with the child and ask the child “who [of the two] is the foreigner?” expecting the child to answer. I wrote the whole opinion imagining this scenario. I also did not want to use the article “a” because it does not put the two groups of people in relation to each other as “the” would do. “The” reminds me that I am talking about one group in relation to the other and not in isolation.
I was sitting at a dinner table having the last meal of the day with my fellow girls from my university residence, Olive Schreiner at Rhodes University. While we were busy sweeping away the boredom of the day, as usual, we started discussing anything that could strike our minds. One of the topics that were raised was the topic of “foreigners”. I was not there when the topic started but I was surprised by the frequent use of the word. The reason why this word struck me was that it has a derogatory message underneath it that we take for granted. The word “foreigner” generally means ‘outsider, alien, non-belonging, savage, primitive’, amongst others. When I asked one of the girls at the table why she called those from other African countries “foreigners”, she said that it was the word used in the dictionary and that there was nothing wrong with the word. She also said that she did not find the word offensive. The light bulb moment struck me when I asked if she would call any American, European or Australian a “foreigner” and she answered that she would rather call them “form overseas’. I want to express how I feel about the way South Africans (I do not mean to over-generalize) see themselves and those from different countries. I find it interesting and controversial to call those other Africans “foreigners” while we call those from the first worlds “from overseas”. We call other Africans “foreigners” because we think that they are outsiders and less worthy, compared to ourselves and those from the first worlds. I say this because we even go to a length of calling Americans, European and Australians with the phrase “from overseas” instead of the one-word noun phrase “foreigners”. It would make at least some sense (not a lot of sense though) if we called those from the first worlds “foreigners” and those form other African countries “from other African countries” because we share soil with the latter. We find it hard to call those from overseas “foreigners” while we have no problem with the word that we use for those who share the same soil with us. I am not buying the excuse of of using the word just because it is from the dictionary. The connotation of the word is the one that matters.
Another point that I want to make is that we still have our minds colonised. Colonisation might be over in the papers but we are still colonised in the mind to think that those “from overseas” are more superior to us in a way that they deserve to belong to our country when they visit, better than those who share African soil with us. While I was thinking of this word and its connotation, I was reminded of a friend who once told me that, when South Africans (again I do not mean to say all South Africans) go to visit other African countries, they says statements such as, “We are going to visit Africa.” This meaning that we have started to think that we are in another planet and that African countries are another entity far away from us. At the moment, I have no word that people could use as a substitute to the word “foreigners”. My reason to writing this opinion is to stimulate thinking and to teach people to scrutinise the words that they use before they use them. This is also because I believe that language shapes the nation and the views that the nation has (thanks to my Linguistics lessons). It is the connotation that matters and not the dictionary meaning, so next time I ask you about the words that you use, do not give me the dictionary as an excuse because I will not but that. I however need not to impose my ideas on other people or make others believe in what I believe. I am very aware of the freedom of speech, choice and expression and aware that people have to choose what they believe in, what they say and how they call other people. I am however encouraging people to criticise their thoughts, beliefs and language. We also have to criticise the way we think about those who we call “others” to us and ask ourselves if we would be happy and comfortable being in the positions in which we put them